Single review: Mariah Carey's "Bye Bye"

Leave it to Mariah Carey to release the two weakest songs from her otherwise solid Energy Equals Mass Times the Velocity of Light Squared as the first two singles from the album. A sequel to "One Sweet Day" by way of every track produced by Stargate in the last 24 months, "Bye Bye" is the most treacly, cloying ballad the singer has recorded in years, a reluctant ode ("We will never say bye," she sings - and then proceeds to say it - incessantly) to the faithful departed.
If there were a popular boy band around, she would have brought them on board for some extra crossover insurance. (Hey, it's not too late for a remix featuring GLOWB - or better yet, NKOTB!) When every single creative decision is made to boost your stock, you're no longer an artist, you're a glorified commodity, and it's telling that of all the things Mariah wishes she could share with her late, long-estranged father, seeing her "back at #1" tops the list.
With a hook that consists solely of the song title repeated ad nauseam, "Bye Bye" exemplifies the worst aspect of the songwriting on the album: The usually eloquent Mariah panders to the demographic she's been courting since O.D.B. astutely equated her with a pacifier on the "Fantasy" remix by dumbing down her lyrics, referring to her "peoples" and reminiscing about "them times".
If possible, Mariah has made a music video even more affected and sentimental than the song itself. Intercut with pictures of lost loved ones (including pets), gratuitous shots of Mimi showing off her newly svelte bod (because even though she's sad, the strip-show must go on!), and an inexplicable storyline featuring her new husband, Nick Cannon, that will supposedly be continued in her next video are scenes of Mariah writing song lyrics in her notepad (which, if Glitter and the upcoming Tennessee are any indication, is apparently a script requirement for Mariah) that doesn't so much legitimize her as a songwriter in the viewers' eyes as it makes her look as if she has a compulsion for journaling. Not to mention looking off into the distance as she ostensibly composes music in her head. And wiping a nonexistent tear from her miraculously unstained face.

(Slant Magazine)

Saturday 17 May 2008
share on facebook share on twitter rss feed
Marcus / Beacon Theater (48,665) by Edward from USA

Marcus, it's amazing you're flying from Brazil to NY to support Mariah, and on two consecutive nights. Congratulations. I hope you have a great time. It's cold here in NY, so get yourself a coat.
(Saturday 20 December 2014; 20:55)
The queen delusion (48,663) by Andrew from UK

The comment that current music listeners just "aren't sophistitcated enough" to appreciate Mariah's songs is a new low for "lamb" excuses. People haven't been playing and buying Mariah's music in the last 5 or 6 years is not because it isnt' good, but because it just isn't that good compared to other releases which can be more catchy (e.g. Taylor S... read more
(Saturday 20 December 2014; 20:28)
Songtitels missing (48,662) by Otti from Belgium

Why are the songtitels in my last post not visible? "Can't take that away" and "Through the rain".
(Saturday 20 December 2014; 19:53)
Do you want to share your thoughts and ideas with other Mariah Carey fans. Are you looking for a special item for your collection? Or do you just want to talk about Mariah? You can do it all on the messageboard.

© The Mariah Carey Archives 1998 - 2014 | 77 visitors online
LATEST NEWS
19-12-2014
19-12-2014
19-12-2014
19-12-2014
18-12-2014
18-12-2014
17-12-2014
17-12-2014
16-12-2014
16-12-2014
THIS DAY IN HISTORY
20-12-2013
20-12-2012
20-12-2011
20-12-2011
20-12-2010
20-12-2008
20-12-2007
20-12-2006
20-12-2006
20-12-2005
20-12-2005
20-12-2004
20-12-2003
20-12-2003
20-12-2003
20-12-2002
20-12-2002
20-12-2002
20-12-2002
20-12-2001
20-12-2001
20-12-2001
20-12-2001
20-12-2001
20-12-2001
20-12-2000
20-12-2000
20-12-2000
20-12-1999
20-12-1993
20-12-2013
20-12-2012
20-12-2011
20-12-2011
20-12-2010
20-12-2008
20-12-2007
20-12-2006
20-12-2006
20-12-2005
20-12-2005
20-12-2004
20-12-2003
20-12-2003
20-12-2003
20-12-2002
20-12-2002
20-12-2002
20-12-2002
20-12-2001
20-12-2001
20-12-2001
20-12-2001
20-12-2001
20-12-2001
20-12-2000
20-12-2000
20-12-2000
20-12-1999
20-12-1993