Messageboard

Re: WWHL After Show (74,789) (74,799) by B from USA Not that I care or that it's any of our business anyways. (Thursday 27 April 2017; 15:45)

Re: WWHL After Show (74,789) (74,798) by B from USA She made Nick wait until they were married so I doubt she had sex with Packer. (Thursday 27 April 2017; 15:45)

Re: The song with Busta (74,796) (74,797) by B from USA I can't wait. I want to hear it now. I wonder if it will be included on MC's new album? On another note I Don't has 17.5 million views (the views are steadily increasing). Does anyone else think the response to I Don't is why Epic and Mariah decided to release a new album this year? She's been working on this album since November of last year, hasn't she? She's made a lot of contradicting sstatements since Stella began her reign of terror. (Thursday 27 April 2017; 15:42)

The song with Busta (74,796) by Gee from U.S.A. (New York City) The new song with Busta is a Busta song with a MC feature for his album so we have to wait until Busta and his team are ready to release it. Hopefully it is soon since it has been teased a little bit and the video has already been shot. (Thursday 27 April 2017; 15:02)

Re: Mary J. Blige's promotion strategies (74,786) (74,795) by Licia from USA I hope everything works out for Mary. Many people say she creates her best material when she's going through things. She's going through alot with that raggedy man. Lol. I just love how she's just working through her pain and trying to move forward. She's not letting her divorce stop her. So far I'm loving the songs that she has released. I have no answers for your Mariah questions. All I can do is hope she will eventually realize that her team is not right for the music aspect of her career. The mess factory is great for reality tv though. Lol. (Thursday 27 April 2017; 14:48)

Re: Nick re: Edward (74,788) (74,794) by Edward from USA Licia, it's not even worth it trying to make some of these people see both of them as human being with flaws instead of just blaming all on one person. In Lala Land, Mariah's behavior would've been questionable only if she had done it to Nick, not to Packer or anybody else. It seems to be that showing respect for the man or woman you're engaged doesn't count because you're not married. Doing crazy stuff while still wearing a ring that represents your commitment to another man doesn't seem to count. But wait a minute, let's look for something to justify this behavior, it's the only way to shift the blame. Well, Packer was a user, using poor Mariah to promote his businesses, he never loved her, and besides, he was too ugly. (All caps) justified. (Thursday 27 April 2017; 14:34)

Re: Nick re: Edward (74,787) (74,793) by darrian liu from taiwan Unless the partner consents for an open relationship, that's not ok. I mean, who goes banging around while being engaged? Cheaters. So by your logic, anyone who isn't married is still single. That means whoever is in a relationship that isn't marriage, like boyfriends, girlfriends, fiances and fiancees, can still sleep around, grind around, go flirting with others and it's ok because they're technically "single"? What? (Thursday 27 April 2017; 14:27)

Re: Nick re: Edward (74,787) (74,792) by Lila from United States The absolute nerve of you to say my logic doesn't make sense then go on to say that an engaged woman is single and free to act as such lol. Engaged is not single. It doesn't matter if it's legally binding or not. Engagements make you promised to one another. You are not single. If you're not ready for that, you don't accept the proposal. I highly doubt if James were caught publicly grinding and rubbing on some woman or women, engaged to Mariah or just "dating", you or any other fan would far from have the same sentiment. It would be all poor Mariah, Mariah must be so hurt, that every name but a child of God hurt our queen. Also, I don't need you to tell me who the hell is the discussion here. I know who is and my point still stands, one that obviously went over your head because James and Mariah wasn't the point. The point was that a woman who will publicly give a lap dance and have one given to her is not the type to get embarrassed or hurt by some throw away comments about her sex life that didn't even put her in a ngeative light. Therefore, there's no need for Mariah's fans to continuously keep on harping on about it, to the point that it would be thought the man was physically abusing her, as their proof for Nick so called hurting Mariah. If Nick's comments embarrassed and/or hurt her, her own actions should've killed her. Thanks for the laugh though and thanks for being a prime example. (Thursday 27 April 2017; 14:24)

Re: New: Anthony Burrell interview (74,783) (74,791) by Mimi L. from Empower Your Highlighter Haha I'm dead at the Danielle Bregoli reference. (Thursday 27 April 2017; 14:21)

Re: New song (74,779) (74,790) by Licia from USA I was wondering about that as well. I hope they are still going to release it. (Thursday 27 April 2017; 14:21)

Re: WWHL After Show (74,778) (74,789) by Mimi L. from Empower Your Highlighter No one is asking her to answer if she did or did not have sex with Packer. I have always said her intimate details are only her business, but she she does have a tendency to ramble on and not answer a question directly even if it's not personal. (Thursday 27 April 2017; 14:18)

Re: Nick re: Edward (74,787) (74,788) by Licia from USA What? She was single, but just engaged? So being engaged means nothing? If ya'll don't get out of here with that bs lol. She was still married and engaged to another man when she displayed her bad behavior. This is what I mean when I say blame both Mariah and Nick fairly. Both of them did things while still married, but only he is getting flamed. (Thursday 27 April 2017; 13:58)

Re: Nick re: Edward (74,781) (74,787) by Terna from Nigeria Your logic doesn't even make sense. Nick and Mariah are what's in discussion here. Not James and Mariah. You do know the difference between a marriage and an engagement now don't you? Nick and Mariah were still legally married (all caps) when he went grinding with those women and the general bad behaviour he put up for the whole world to see. Mariah on the other hand was single and just engaged (all caps) she's single at that point and still at liberty to live the life of one who's single. An engagement isn't legally binding, but a marriage is. Jeez. (Thursday 27 April 2017; 13:21)

Mary J. Blige's promotion strategies (74,786) by this_is_qhm from the Philippines While Mary's going all out on promoting her new album that drops tomorrow (so excited) she's doing so in ways that exude class and maturity. With social media teasers and pictures here and there on a daily basis, a documentary on the album's creation coming out in May, plus the fact that the public actually got to miss her enough to long for her return. All of this could bode well for her new set and make up for the minor commercial success of its preceding (brilliant) singles. Meanwhile, Mariah is out there barely rocking ill-fitting outfits she might as well bust (pun intended) out of. I'd wonder why Mary can pull this off and why Mariah can't, but then again Stella's there to enable Mariah's newfound I-don't-give-a-what attitude and indulge her need for constant adoration, so I guess Mariah had it coming by choosing to stick to that bitch responsible for accelerating her career decline at a rate faster than you can even read this sentence. (Thursday 27 April 2017; 12:02)

Andrew the [censored] (74,785) by Terna from Nigeria You're a man Andrew and so am I. You have something to say to me, don't say it indirectly cosigning another person. Say it to me like a real man would. Cowardly much? You're the crazy here talking shite and rambling nonsense and no one takes you seriously. Always remember that. (Thursday 27 April 2017; 10:36)

Re: Things we particularly like about Mariah (74,753) (74,784) by Terna from Nigeria Yes I see her as a grounded celebrity. Do you have a problem with that? Mariah has money but hasn't let it get into her head, and doesn't do the stupid things people like her who have touched money do, she's pretty much the same Mariah Carey from the start. She knows who she is and has stuck to it and doesn't strive to blend in or fit into a particular standard or any one's box. She leads, not follows. You Bill seem to be living under a rock if you as a Mariah fan (as you claim to be) haven't noticed that about her. Mariah repeats clothes, pretty much looks the same and isn't botched like say Lil Kim, Cher or those Kardashians (seen how Khloe looks lately?), nor going around looking altered and stupid with the so called "Duck Lips" fad plague that seems to have taken over Hollywood and even the general public. She treats people nicely like they're actual people. That's not grounded enough huh Bill for Uk? You look stupid making that statement now don't you? (Thursday 27 April 2017; 10:27)

Re: New: Anthony Burrell interview (74,758) (74,783) by Manny from U.S. When Anthony talked about green people or inexperienced people in her team, I thought of that cringeworthy scene of Stella defending Mariah's ass pic. Her argument was that it went viral. Anthony was in disbelief. Guess what else went viral Stella?The "Cash me outside, how 'bout dat" girl. I think Stella should go work for her instead. Mishka will be perfect in handling her Instagram account. (Thursday 27 April 2017; 09:34)

Anthony (74,782) by Lila from United States I definitely applaud Anthony for his answer to the questions. He kept it professional and as a few have already noted he didn't burn bridges. He's smart and/or just has some common sense. Burning bridges is a two way street you may cut the other off from you but you also cut yourself off from the other. In a professional environment you've got to be very careful of which bridges are actually worth burning because it's not a surety that other will need you before you need the other. (Thursday 27 April 2017; 06:18)

Re: Nick re: Edward (74,777) (74,781) by Lila from United States It's quite bewildering, but unsurprising, how in Mariah's World: Fan Edition, its acceptable to exaggerate how, in some fans minds, hurt, embarrassed and/or offended Mariah was over some throw away complimentary comments Nick made about his and Mariah's love life or comments about this or that person (the way many go on and on, you'd think she was a victim of domestic violence); yet, Mariah can give some idiot a lap dance and have vice versa done to her, all the while being supposedly engaged to another man, put it on public display and these same fans will pretend it never happened or can't be bothered to think it's a big deal. Going by their own standards, if Nick's comments were so hurtful, her own actions should've killed or, at least, ko'd her. If you're going to call out sides, call out both and judge by the same standards/criteria. (Thursday 27 April 2017; 05:43)

Re: Edward (74,780) by Nikki from usa Talk about seeing what you want. I never stated the webmaster wouldn't support "receipts". I was referring to the fact he doesn't like excessive links which is something he's mentioned before. But, way to go off on a tangent. Nobody said Nick "beat" Mariah or half that crazy stuff you came up with. It is a fact Nick is a well known playboy and has been long before he hooked up with Mariah. It is also a fact he's a multi-entertainer who's held down several different jobs at the same time since he was 17 - you can look it up. That's his work ethic, not because people were *gasp* "talking". We both know you'd never excuse Mariah for anything real or imagined just because people were "talking". Mariah didn't "behave" in any inappropriate manner while married to Nick. I'm referring to him failing a public lie detector test on fidelity and allowing 3 women to grind on him while married to Mariah (not after serving divorce papers, but before). I find your reference to Mariah's "decency" as nothing but sexism for how you think a married woman should look. Apparently, a man cheating is okay if his wife is being indecent by wearing pig tails. Mariah was there for Nick in his time of need and put her career on hold, Nick didn't reciprocate. One of these is not like the others. What I can't help but notice is you don't seem to be disputing Nick's actions as much as you seem to think Mariah deserved it because you don't find her "perfect". (Thursday 27 April 2017; 05:32)

New song (74,779) by G.G. from USA What the hell happened to the new song with Busta? (Thursday 27 April 2017; 04:06)

Re: WWHL After Show (74,765) (74,778) by Edouard from France Well she did answer, in her own way. When you know Mariah, you know what she means. I actually like the way she answered about the "did you consommate your relationship" question. At first I was like "c'mon Mariah, answer the damn question". Than I was like she did answer, in a very feminine and feminist way: "I could, I don't think that I should." Very classy IMO. No she doesn't have to answer that, it's private. She's not a piece of meat. She has respect for herself and she doesn't fell she has to answer that question. (Thursday 27 April 2017; 01:47)

Re: Nick re: Edward (74,770) (74,777) by Mimi L. from Empower Your Highlighter Not to start anything but wasn't there even a shot of Bryan basically burying his face in Mariah's bosom in MW? Haha messy me actually went and found the gif, and dahlin' don't even get me started on that messy lap dance and the cringe worthy videos from the post Paris show/Vodka launch party. I cannot deal. (Wednesday 26 April 2017; 20:54)

Re: WWHL After Show (74,773) (74,776) by Mimi L. from Empower Your Highlighter Haha almost forgot their [sic] was a debate. Darn it. (Wednesday 26 April 2017; 20:48)

Re: New: Anthony Burrell interview (74,766) (74,775) by MusicfanJ from Germany 1. Don't mess with Crustella 2. The story of my unbridled success (how I became the manager of Mariah) 3. Fun with the Bulochnikovs 4. My new bff (empower girls forever) 5. The docu-series of MC and the Bulochnikovs (extra-festive) (Wednesday 26 April 2017; 20:38)

MORE MESSAGES